A regional government has $10 million to spend on heat adaptation across two cities in the same metropolitan region. Both cities experience the same heatwave and similar temperatures, but outcomes differ significantly.
City A has higher tree canopy, newer buildings, widespread air conditioning, and higher income levels.
City B has low tree canopy, older buildings, less access to air conditioning, lower income, and a higher elderly population.
Recent data shows:
City A: 14 heat-related hospital admissions per 100,000
City B: 58 heat-related hospital admissions per 100,000
Your Task
Explain why City B experiences worse outcomes using the Hazard–Exposure–Vulnerability framework. Identify at least three drivers.
Write a 3–4 sentence rebuttal to a proposal for equal funding across both cities.
Allocate the $10M budget and identify three priority interventions for City B.
