As the global geopolitical landscapes continuously shift, companies are being faced with unprecedented difficulties in measuring and managing their greenhouse gas emissions. Traditional frameworks, focused specifically on Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and increasingly Scope 3, are no longer sufficient as global supply chains fragment due to deglobalization, geopolitical tensions, and regional trade realignments. This complex landscape compels companies to rethink value chain emissions beyond conventional boundaries, responding to localised risks and changing supplier dynamics. By embracing a sustainable and adaptive approach, businesses are in a better position to navigate emissions accountability, regulatory requirements, and shareholder expectations while positioning themselves as responsible leaders in a fragmented world economy.
Why rethinking scope 3 matters in a changing global context
Scope 3 emissions, accounting for indirect emissions across a corporation’s entire value chain, have presented measurement and management challenges for many years. They often represent the majority of corporate businesses’ carbon footprints, spanning from raw materials extraction to product use and end-of-life disposal. However, the Scope 3 frameworks currently in use presume relatively stable, integrated global supply chains and predictable partner relationships. Today’s geopolitical turmoil, from trade wars, sanctions, to regionalisation of manufacturing, completely disrupts these assumptions. Shifting supply routes, localised carbon regulations, and changing supplier compliance create new blind spots and data integrity issues. Businesses risk underestimating emissions exposure or missing opportunities for actual reductions if they cling solely to legacy inventory and reporting frameworks. To stay competitive and ahead of the curve, companies must scrutinise the architecture of their supply networks through a new mindset attuned to fragmentation and local variances.
Who is leading the way in emission rethinking?
Multinational corporations across diverse sectors are pioneering approaches in response to this complexity:
- Consumer Electronics: A leading manufacturer is applying advanced blockchain-enabled traceability to verify low-carbon activities among newly diversified Southeast Asia and Eastern Europe suppliers, offsetting risks posed by tariff shifts.
- Automotive Industry: Global automakers are collaborating with regional partners to co-design customized emissions data models that take localized energy mixes and transportation modes into account, enabling more granular Scope 3 accounting amid supply base shifts.
- Food and Beverage: Businesses are integrating farm-level sustainability data from fragmented agri-suppliers, combining remote sensing technology with community engagement to improve data validity and identify emissions hotspots more precisely.
What are some key strategies for rethinking value chain emissions in a fragmented world?
- Dynamic Supply Chain Mapping: Streamlining supply network footprints in real-time to factor in supplier shifts, geopolitical risks, and regulatory landscapes allows companies to identify emerging hotspots and vulnerabilities.
- Localised Emission Factors: Replacing generic factors with region- and supplier-focused data improves accuracy, taking into consideration actual energy sources, production processes, and transportation modes across diversified geographies.
- Digital Traceability and Verification: Blockchain, IoT sensors, and AI analytics provide trusted, real-time emissions data streams that facilitate timely responses to supply disruptions or compliance gaps.
- Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement: Building partnerships with suppliers, local governments, and NGOs enables transparency, capacity building, and shared responsibilities in emission reduction efforts.
- Scenario Planning and Risk Modelling: Anticipating geopolitical shifts and trade reconfigurations through advanced analytics helps companies stress-test emissions goals and revise strategies proactively.
How can Strategy&Ops support companies in navigating emissions beyond scope 3?
- Creating tailored frameworks for emissions measurement that account for geopolitical realities and fragmented value chains.
- Facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogues to coordinate incentives and improve data exchange between complex supplier networks.
- Applying cutting-edge technology solutions for gathering emissions data, verifying it, and forecasting it.
- Improving organisational capabilities in adaptive climate risk management and sustainable procurement.
- Offering advice on innovative finance models that incentivise emission reductions throughout diversified supply landscapes.
In a time defined by uncertainty and fragmentation, companies must shift traditional Scope 3 assessments to fully grasp and mitigate their value chain climate impacts. By rethinking emissions measurement and management through a geopolitical lens, companies can safeguard resilience, compliance, and reputation while driving meaningful progress towards net-zero. If your organisation is ready to lead in this critical transformation, contact Strategy&Ops at info@strategyandops.net to discover tailored solutions that empower climate-smart value chain transformation.
#BeyondScope3 #ValueChainEmissions #SupplyChainResilience #ClimateRiskManagement #SustainableBusiness #GeopoliticsAndClimate #InnovativeClimateAction
References
Amundi (n.d.) Challenges measuring Scope 3 emissions. Available at: https://www.amundi.com/institutional/article/challenges-measuring-scope-3-emissions
Arcadis (2025) Scope 3 emissions: how companies can move from reporting to real impact. Available at: https://www.arcadis.com/en/insights/blog/united-states/katie-eisenbrown/2025/scope-3-emissions-how-companies-can-move-from-reporting-to-real-impact
Deloitte (n.d.) Challenges and solutions – Scope 3 emissions. Available at: https://www.deloitte.com/nl/en/issues/climate/challenges-and-solutions-scope-3-emissions.html
Emerald Publishing (n.d.) ‘Impact pathways: the hidden challenges of Scope 3’, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(13). Available at: https://www.emerald.com/ijopm/article/44/13/326/1236648/Impact-pathways-the-hidden-challenges-of-Scope-3
MIT Sloan (2024) Scope 3 emissions top supply chain sustainability challenges. Available at: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/scope-3-emissions-top-supply-chain-sustainability-challenges
NetNada (n.d.) Scope 3 emissions – why it’s the hardest to measure and how to get it right. Available at: https://www.netnada.com/post/scope-3-emissions—why-its-the-hardest-to-measure-how-to-get-it-right
SWEET (Sweep.net) (n.d.) SWEET Guide SFSC 2.0. Available at: https://www.sweep.net/pdf/sweep_guide_sfsc_2-0_v4-11671.pdf
Terrascope (n.d.) Overcoming challenges in understanding and quantifying Scope 3 emissions for large enterprises. Available at: https://www.terrascope.com/blog/overcoming-challenges-in-understanding-and-quantifying-scope-3-emissions-for-large-enterprises
US EPA (n.d.) Scope 3 inventory guidance. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/scope-3-inventory-guidance